![\"110518_MD_mehra\"](\"https:\/\/www.vmcdn.ca\/f\/files\/sudbury\/uploadedImages\/news\/localNews\/2018\/05\/110518_md_mehra.JPG;w=960\")
<\/p>\n(March 22, 2021)<\/p>\n
By: Arron Pickard, Sudbury.com<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Natalie Mehra is the executive director of the Ontario Health Coalition. (File)<\/em><\/p>\n Canadians like to be proud of the country\u2019s health-care system and to believe everyone has equal access to it, but when it comes to the elderly in Ontario, that is not the situation, said a group that is calling for an inquiry under the Human Rights Commission.<\/p>\n The Ontario Health Coalition<\/a> (OHC), the Ontario Council of Hospital Unions (OCHU) of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), and the Advocacy Centre for Elderly (ACE) are asking Ontarians to add their voice to a call for a \u201cground-breaking human rights inquiry into systemic discrimination based on age against the elderly in the provision of hospital and long-term care,\u201d said the group.<\/p>\n Natalie Mehra<\/a>, executive director, OHC, said the bare truth is that successive provincial governments have pursued \u201cthe most radical hospital downsizing\u201d of any province in Canada, and it has gone on for more than three decades.<\/p>\n Sudbury has been particularly hard hit and has experienced the \u201cterrible problems that have come from that extreme downsizing,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n Health Sciences North is chronically overcrowded, often running at or above 100-per-cent capacity, meaning every bed is full and patients are backlogged to the emergency department, Mehra said. Furthermore, there\u2019s enormous pressure to move the elderly out of beds and move to wherever whether it\u2019s safe or not.<\/p>\n The wait list for people to get into long-term care homes across Ontario is 38,000 names long, she said. In Sudbury, there are 1,227 people on the wait list for long-term care, and wait lists range up to 1,655 days, or 4.5 years.<\/p>\n \u201cThese are policy choices,\u201d Mehra said. \u201cThey have been cornerstone health-care policies for more than two decades, and Ontario has funded our health care in the lowest tier of all the provinces.<\/p>\n Bad policy led to \u2018ghastly\u2019 pandemic death toll<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cDuring the pandemic, we saw, to our absolute horror, the worst mass casualty event in our long-term care history, and in our view, many of those deaths were avoidable.\u201d<\/p>\n The policies of denying access to hospital care for the elderly were instrumental in the \u201cghastly\u201d death toll, she said, but also instrumental was the \u201clongstanding and terrible inadequacy of care in LTC homes.\u201d<\/p>\n There is responsibility to be taken at the facility level, no question, she said, but there is also a systemic ageism in Ontario\u2019s health system that treats the elderly as though their lives are less meaningful, and as though their right to care is less than others, and it must be challenged, \u201cparticularly in light of the horrors we\u2019ve witnessed in the last year,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n Across Ontario, 2,200 mostly elderly people deemed alternate level of care (ALC) patients were offloaded from hospitals in the early months of the pandemic to make way for patients who were deemed more important, she said. It happened in Sudbury, where patients were offloaded to LTC homes and retirement homes, and ALC patients were offloaded to the Clarion Hotel.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, there were thousands of seniors across the province in long-term care homes \u201cmany with woefully inadequate care, many without family until the very end, if at all,\u201d Mehra said.<\/p>\n It\u2019s a cruel picture, she said, but it predates COVID-19.<\/p>\n \u201cWe have spent years protesting,\u201d she said. \u201cWe have met with health ministers, we have met with the premier, we have done petitions, everything possible, yet this policy continues.<\/p>\n \u201cWe have heard frequent pleas from families that need help, and these pleas can no longer fall on deaf ears. The fact is, a formal human rights inquiry into the systemic discrimination against the elderly is long overdue.\u201d<\/p>\n Long-Term Care COVID-19 Commission<\/strong><\/p>\n Ontario\u2019s Long-Term Care COVID-19 Commission has already launched its own inquiry, said Adriel Weaver,\u00a0 a lawyer with Goldblatt Partners LLP. However, that commission is intended to provide immediate answers to a relatively narrow set of questions.<\/p>\n \u201cIn our view, a broader systemic inquiry is urgently needed,\u201d Weaver said. \u201cThe fact that policies of de-hospitalization and chronic underfunding of long-term care disproportionately affect elderly Ontarians cannot be overlooked.\u201d<\/p>\n She said the factors that underlie the \u201cdeplorable conditions\u201d at some long-term care facilities cannot be meaningfully resolved or addressed without naming and engaging with the systemic age-based descrimination that shapes the provision of health care in this province.<\/p>\n The Human Rights Commission\u2019s particular expertise in relation to discrimination and equality rights, coupled with the inquiry powers afforded to it, make it ideally suited to carry out such an inquiry, she said.<\/p>\n \u201cThis problem of age-related discrimination and the provision of health care in the province will only grow and deepen as Ontario\u2019s population ages,\u201d she said. \u201cThe commission has an important role to play in illuminating and addressing this pervasive and longstanding form of discrimination.\u201d<\/p>\n Closing beds as population grows<\/strong><\/p>\n Over the last 25 years, Ontario has closed more than 20,000 hospital beds, and over that period, the population has grown by more than 4.5 million, or more than 40 per cent, and the population has aged where we are now at the point where the number of people ages 65 and over has more than doubled in that time, he said.<\/p>\n Yet, Ontario has the lowest number of hospital beds and staff to population anywhere in the country, and the second lowest rate of long-term care capacity anywhere in Canada, he said.<\/p>\n \u201cWe believe that, as the Ontario population grew in age, health care costs were restrained by denying health services to the elderly,\u201d said Hurley.<\/p>\n \u201cAt no time has this been more starkly apparent that during the pandemic, when thousands of critically ill long-term care residents were not only not transferred to hospital, they were left to die and infect others in long-term care.\u201d<\/p>\n The elderly were turned away from health services, pushed out of hospital, or deprived access to long-term care or other services because it is being rationed, he said. They were lied to about their options, and they were taken advantage of in moments of extreme vulnerability.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is how we treat the people who built this country,\u201d he said. \u201cWe abhor this discrimination and the provision of health-care services on the basis of age.\u201d<\/p>\n System needs a correction<\/strong><\/p>\n Ageism, rationing and the infantilization of the elderly result in pain and suffering and the neglect of health-care conditions that would be dealt with urgently in a younger person, Hurley said.<\/p>\n \u201cDuring this pandemic, this discrimination needlessly killed thousands in our direct care by denying them access to hospitalization, to preserve hospital beds and ICUs for younger Ontarians.\u201d he said. \u201cThis discrimination will get worse as the elderly population grows at a rapid pace and will do so for decades.\u201d<\/p>\n The group is also calling on the province to immediately correct the \u201clegacies of discriminatory policies\u201d in health care, of which it is not by any means the sole author, said Hurley.<\/p>\n Specifically, the groups is asking the Ontario government to:<\/p>\n -Commit that everyone will have access to the hospital and long-term care they require, free from discrimination based on age.<\/p>\n -Prohibit the transfer of alternate level of care patients who are awaiting hospital care, to non-hospital facilities.<\/p>\n -Ensure that ALC patients who are waiting for placement in an LTC home are not coerced to go to facilities that are not long-term care homes.<\/p>\n -Stop the privatization of public hospital care of the elderly, including of complex continuing care, of convalescent care, and rehabilitation and palliative care.<\/p>\n -Issue a policy directive to LTC homes requiring them to transfer residents to public hospitals where it is medically necessary and appropriate, subject to their right to informed consent, and prohibit the refusal of these transfers by hospitals.<\/p>\n -Restore the capacity needed to meet the demographic health-care challenges in the short term by reopening and staffing closed beds, building 50,000 public non-profit long-term care beds, and hiring 34,000 full-time equivalent long-term care staff and fast tracking that hiring, where possible, and providing emergency aid and funding to public hospitals.<\/p>\n \u201cWe are also calling on the federal government to increase its share of health-care funding, to support these vital services while strengthening national standards and enforcement of these standards,\u201d said Hurley. The declining federal contribution is an active contributor to the discrimination by virtue of its refusal to accept the funding implications of an aging population,\u201d<\/p>\n The group is asking Ontarians to send their own letters to the Human Rights commissioner about the struggles they\u2019ve experienced in the health care system. They are also asking that letters be written to Premier Doug Ford.<\/p>\n For more information on the letter-writing campaign,\u00a0click here<\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n \u201cWe are trying to mount as much political pressure as possible to get the government to move on these issues immediately,\u201d said the group. \u201cWe can\u2019t wait for an inquiry to improve the levels and access to care.\u201d<\/p>\n